Readings for Sep 15 on health care | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:22:36 -0700 (PDT) |
On Tues. Sep 15 Kip Sullivan <kiprs [at] usinternet.com> who belongs to the steering committee of the Minnesota chapter of Physicians for a National Health Program will speak on: The health care reform trainwreck in Washington Kip has written useful background info for his talk. The first is an article written for the Physicians for a National Health Program blog criticizing the "public option" movement for not telling the public that the Democrats' version of the "option" is puny and will do nothing to bring premiums down. It can be read at: http://tinyurl.com/kip-baitswitch ( Which goes to: http://pnhp.org/blog/2009/07/20/ bait-and-switch-how-the-%e2%80%9cpublic-option%e2%80%9d-was-sold/ ) The second is an article quotes Dennis Kucinich urging people to read my stuff on the PNHP blog and reinforcing what I'm saying about the "option." Tho it can be read at the url below, truthdig.com requires free registration to read articles so the short article is included below. http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090903_dont_be_fooled_by_the_public_op Posted on Sep 3, 2009 White House / Pete Souza By Bill Boyarsky While the media are transfixed by all the screaming in town halls and on television, the real work of health care reform is being done in secret by congressional staff technocrats, government bureaucrats, health industry lobbyists and sometimes even a member of the Senate or House. The controversy over the so-called public option is a prime example of what is happening. Under this arrangement, government health insurance plans are supposed to compete with those offered by private insurance companies, with the hope of forcing the private companies to lower prices and expand benefits. Advocates of this scheme offer it as an alternative to what's known as universal medical care, Medicare for all or "single payer", which would eliminate the role of insurance companies altogether in favor of a government-only plan. Many liberals say such far-reaching reform is unattainable. As a compromise, they support the public option. The fight over the public option has occupied much of the media coverage, but left unsaid is the fact that weeks of behind-the-scenes negotiations have weakened the public option proposal to the point that it is hardly an option at all. I discussed the matter with Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio. Kucinich favors universal health insurance coverage, not the public option. So do I. A health care reform bill was approved by the House Energy and Commerce Committee in July. Kucinich said that a final version?the real bill?is now being rewritten and will be presented to committee chairs and other leaders, who will bring the revised version to the House floor. ?It?s happening now,? he said. "It's being done by the leadership, and we [members of Congress] don?t know what's going on." Kucinich is the author of an amendment to the House bill that would ease federal barriers to states wanting to enact universal care plans of their own. Legislators are engaged in such efforts in California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Washington. He told me it "was one of the few provisions in a badly flawed bill that could provide benefits." Kucinich suggested I read articles written by health insurance expert Kip Sullivan on the Web site of Physicians for a National Health Program, which advocates government-run universal health care. Sullivan, he said, has figured out the real story.
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.