|Progressive Calendar 03.10.10||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: David Shove (shove001tc.umn.edu)|
|Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:27:34 -0800 (PST)|
P R O G R E S S I V E C A L E N D A R 03.10.10 1. Freedom of info 3.10 11am 2. URGENT CUAPB ACTION 3.10 2pm+ 3. Sen John Marty - Corporations are NOT people 4. Jeremy Hammond - Washington Post: "lunatic" 9/11 "conspiracy theorists" --------1 of 4-------- From: Andy Driscoll <andy [at] driscollgroup.com> Subject: Freedom of information 3.10 11am FREEDOM OF INFORMATION DAY: Celebrating Access to Government WEDNESDAY, MARCH 10 - 11:00AM KFAI - 90.3FM-Minneapolis/106.7FM Saint Paul and STREAMING at KFAI.org The annual Freedom of Information Day is upon us March 16, sponsored by the Minnesota Council on Government information (MN-COGI). You'd think this would not be a necessary day, but government at all levels, remains hell-bent on classifying or labeling as private or secret or confidential much of the information that should be made public. Freedom of Information Day is also the time when MN-COGI presents its annual John R. Finnegan Freedom of Information Award, given to an individual whose work is dedicated to opening up government and the public realm to all of us. TTT' ANDY DRISCOLL and LYNNELL MICKELSEN talk with this year's awardee and the man for whom that award is named plus a couple of otherFOI activists with MN-COGI about just what we can all do to demand openness in government business and ensuring the public receives the information it deserves in a democracy. GUESTS: JOHN R. FINNEGAN - retired Editor of the St. Paul Pioneer Press REED ANFINSON - Publisher of the Swift County Monitor-News, Benson, MN; Winner of the 2010 Finnegan Award MARY TREACY - Executive Director of the Minnesota Council on Government information ART HUGHES - Veteran Minnesota Journalist and MN-COGI Board Member AND YOU! CAN'T GET STREAM TTT LIVE and LATER --------2 of 4-------- Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:10:19 -0600 From: Michelle Gross <mgresist [at] visi.com> Subject: URGENT CUAPB ACTION 3.10 2pm+ Communities United Against Police Brutality ACTION ALERT March 9, 2010 URGENT ACTION NEEDED: BILL WOULD ELIMINATE ACCESS TO COMPLAINT DATA HEARING TOMORROW! [TODAY! 3.10] House Civil Justice Committee Meeting Wednesday, March 10 10 State Office Building State Capitol Complex, St. Paul Meeting lasts from 8:30 a.m., will reconvene at 6 p.m. to finish agenda (this item is near the end of the agenda) HF2609 would eliminate access to information about complaints against staff at secure treatment facilities and state correctional facilities (prisons), effectively wiping out access to the complaint histories of prison guards. This is one step away from wiping out access to complaints against cops. CUAPB is 100% against this law and any others like it. In addition to taking on complaints against cops, we take on complaints dealing with mistreatment at the jails and prisons, which is even harder to deal with because there is no agency to file a complaint about brutal jailers and these cases are even harder to fight. The community must have access to the complaint history of jailers. To put this in context, anyone can get the complaint history of a teacher, worker at the state tax office, etc. Why should jailers be any different. Please try to attend this meeting and be prepared to speak out against this terrible bill. It's uncertain what time the bill will be heard but given the length of the agenda (http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/comm/committee.asp?comm=86128 and scroll down on the right), it's pretty safe that **you could get there about 2 p.m., maybe later, and not miss it**. If you're not able to attend, please call the legislators listed on the committee web page and tell them to vote NO to HF2609. <http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/bills/billnum.asp?Billnumber=HF2609&ls_year=86&session_year=2009&session_number=0>HF2609 (Thissen) Disclosure of disciplinary records limited. <http://wdoc.house.leg.state.mn.us/leg/LS86/HF2609.0.pdf>http://wdoc.house.leg.state.mn.us/leg/LS86/HF2609.0.pdf Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.43, subdivision 5a, is amended to read: 1.6 Subd. 5a. Limitation on disclosure of certain personnel data. Notwithstanding 1.7any other provision of this section, the following data relating to employees of a secure 1.8treatment facility defined in section 253B.02, subdivision 18a, employees of a state 1.9correctional facility, or employees of the Department of Corrections directly involved in 1.10supervision of offenders in the community, shall not be disclosed to facility patients, 1.11corrections inmates, or other individuals who facility or correction administrators 1.12reasonably believe will use the information to harass, intimidate, or assault any of 1.13these employees: place where previous education or training occurred; place of prior 1.14employment; existence and status of any complaints or charges against the employee, 1.15regardless of whether the complaint or charge resulted in disciplinary action; final 1.16disposition of any disciplinary action together with the specific reasons for the action and 1.17data documenting the basis of the action; and payroll timesheets or other comparable data, 1.18to the extent that disclosure of payroll timesheets or other comparable data may disclose 1.19future work assignments, home address or telephone number, the location of an employee 1.20during nonwork hours, or the location of an employee's immediate family members. Communities United Against Police Brutality 3100 16th Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55407 Hotline 612-874-STOP (7867) Meetings: Every Saturday at 1:30 p.m. at Walker Church, 3104 16th Avenue South http://www.CUAPB.org --------3 of 4-------- From: Senator John Marty <info [at] johnmarty.org> Subject: Corporations are NOT People People tend to shrug off change in our political process. Money in politics? Corporate lobbyists "fixing" legislation? Some people think it's simply the way our system will always be. It doesn't have to be. We can have a different kind of government, a different kind of politics. For two decades, I've been working to take money out of politics and restore people's faith in government. As Governor, I will lead Minnesota in reclaiming democracy for the public interest, not the special Interests. When Ronald Reagan took office there was a shift in this country, from "government can help us solve our problems," to "government is the problem." Republicans endlessly repeat the rhetoric about the evils of Big Government. But the real problem today is big corporations. Their money dominates our political process, our news media, and so many other parts of our lives. And now the U.S. Supreme Court has found a problem none of us knew existed -- they think there is not enough corporate money in politics! They ruled corporations can pour unlimited amounts of corporate money directly into our political process. Insurance companies and the pharmaceutical lobby have been spending millions to block health care reform at the federal and state level, and now they have been given the green light to contribute even more. That's why I've led the fight for government ethics and campaign finance reform. In the early 1990s, I passed a major campaign finance reform bill to restrict special interest money in politics. I authored and fought for the law banning lobbyist gifts to politicians. Today, I continue that fight with my legislation to stop the Revolving Door which allows public officials to become lobbyists after leaving office. This critical piece of legislation is on the Minnesota Senate floor now. As governor, my Clean Money campaign finance reform plan will be front and center on the state's agenda. We will pass, and I will sign, this legislation, which will be a powerful response to the increasing flow of corporate money to politics as a result of the Supreme Court ruling. I am the only candidate for governor who has rejected all PAC and lobbyist money. I have stood up to the insurance companies and pharmaceutical lobby in creating the single-payer Minnesota Health Plan. I will enter the governor's office without being beholden to any special interest group, and will set Minnesota's agenda to serve the public's interest, not the corporation's interests. Corporations are not people. Corporations were originally created to serve the needs of people, not the other way around. With your help, we can win this race and return our government to the people of Minnesota. Please join me in restoring government of the people, by the people, and for the people. --------4 of 4-------- The Washington Post on "Lunatic" 9/11 "Conspiracy Theorists" by Jeremy R. Hammond March 9th, 2010 Dissident Voice An editorial in the Washington Post yesterday slammed Japanese member of parliament Yukihisa Fujita because he "seems to think that America's rendering of the events of Sept. 11, 2001, is a gigantic hoax". His "ideas" about the terrorist attacks "are too bizarre, half-baked and intellectually bogus to merit serious discussion". Fujita, the editorial added, is a member of "the lunatic fringe" who "have spawned a thriving subculture of conspiracy theorists at home and abroad", and "his views, rooted as they are in profound distrust of the United States, seem to reflect a strain of anti-American thought". The piece closes by suggesting that the "fact-averse" Fujita should be removed from office. Among Fujita's "bizarre" views are "that shadowy forces with advance knowledge of the plot played the stock market to profit from it", "the fantastic idea that eight of the 19 hijackers are alive and well", and "that controlled demolition rather than fire or debris may be a more likely explanation for at least the collapse of the building at 7 World Trade Center". Yet while serving out a hit piece against the global "9/11 Truth" movement, it is in fact the editors of the Washington Post who are demonstrably "fact-averse". It happens to be an uncontroversial fact that in the days just prior to the attacks, there was a dramatic increase in trade on put options, and what made this unusual spike even more mysterious was that it was observed only in relation to companies directly affected by the attacks, including United Airlines, American Airlines, and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. (which occupied 22 floors of 2 World Trade Center). That this occurred was, in fact, mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report, which reported that the federal investigations into the suspicious trading concluded that it was all "innocuous". Many of the trades on the airline companies, for instance, were traced to a "single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda". In other words, the report acknowledges that the suspicious trades did, in fact, occur, but dismisses this as evidence of foreknowledge because the investigation didn't lead to the proper predetermined culprits. This is illustrative of the kind of standard the 9/11 Commission employed throughout its so-called "investigation". The "fantastic" idea that the identity of the hijackers named by the FBI is in question is an interesting case. At the time, the Washington Post had also subscribed to this "half-baked" notion. On September 20, 2001, under the headline "Some Hijackers' Identities Uncertain", the Post reported, "FBI officials said yesterday that some of the 19 terrorists who carried out last week's assault on New York and Washington may have stolen the identities of other people, and their real names may remain unknown". Among the evidence for this, the Post cited "Saudi government officials" as having determined "that at least two of the terrorists used the names of living, law-abiding Saudi citizens". The man in the picture of one of the alleged hijackers, the Post reported, was Salem Al-Hazmi, who was actually alive and well, according to Gaafar Allagany, the chief of the Saudi Embassy's information office in Washington. The real Al-Hazmi's "passport was stolen by a pickpocket on a trip to Cairo three years" before. Another of the alleged hijackers was Abdulaziz Al-Omari, who, Allagany said, was also alive and "an electrical engineer in Saudi Arabia". "The uncertainty", the Post continued, "highlights how difficult it may be to ever identify some of the hijackers who participated in the deadliest act of violence on American soil. Most of the hijackers' bodies were obliterated in the fiery crashes". The Washington Post was not the only mainstream media outlet to report on the uncertainty over the hijacker's identities. It was widely reported elsewhere, both in the U.S. and international media. The U.K.'s Guardian, for instance, reported on September 21 under the headline "False identities mislead FBI" that "The FBI acknowledged yesterday that some of the terrorists involved in the attacks last week were using false identities", with regard to Al-Hazmi and Al-Omari. FBI acknowledgment of this was also reported by the BBC the same day under the headline "FBI probes hijackers' identities". The BBC also reported on September 22 under the headline "Hijack 'suspect' alive in Morocco" that Waleed Al-Shehri, another alleged hijacker, the "same Mr Al-Shahri" whose photo the FBI had released as being among the terrorists, "has turned up in Morocco, proving clearly that he was not a member of the suicide attack". On September 23, under the headline "Hijack 'suspects' alive and well", the BBC reported that yet "Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker ... has turned up alive and well" and that "The identities of four of the 19 suspects ... are now in doubt". FBI Director Robert Mueller also "acknowledged ... that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt". The London Telegraph similarly ran a story on September 23 entitled "Revealed: the men with stolen identities". The Washington Post itself ran a follow-up article on September 25 entitled "Some Light Shed On Saudi Suspects", reporting that "U.S. investigators believe they have positively identified 15 of the 19 hijackers", but that the identify of the other four was still in question. On September 27, even while releasing the official list of hijackers along with their photos, the FBI confirmed that uncertainty remained over some of the identities. Mueller acknowledged that the FBI was still "determining whether when these individuals came to the United States these were their real names, or they changed their names for use with false identification in the United States; that false identification being used up to and on the day of September 11th, and that false identification used to purchase the tickets, and thereby being the name on the manifests of the planes that went down". Yet, despite these facts, neither the Washington Post nor any other mainstream media outlet has ever offered any follow-up reports explaining whether, and how, this uncertainty was finally resolved. The FBI has never clarified this matter to the public. The 9/11 Commission didn't so much as even address the question, even to attempt to clear up the matter. And so it remains an uncontroversial fact, as far as the public is concerned, that the identify of at least several of the hijackers remains in question. Why the government has refused to clarify this issue, and why the media now report anyone who doesn't have a short memory about 9/11 as being part of a "lunatic fringe" are also open questions that warrant some kind of explanation. Finally, there is the matter of the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings. Many people might be surprised to learn that not only two towers fell on September 11. In fact, a third skyscraper also collapsed that day neatly into its own footprint. It is also an uncontroversial fact that proper investigative procedures for such disasters, particularly in cases where a crime has been committed, were contemptuously ignored in the case of the WTC. For starters, the evidence from the crime scene in the form of the remains of the three buildings was removed and immediately destroyed. Destruction of evidence is, itself, a crime, and yet that is what happened. Other standard procedures were also ignored, such as testing for any kinds of accelerants that may have been responsible for the building failures. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has released what is supposed to be the conclusive report on the building collapses. Yet, the explanation it provides, too, is inadequate, to say the least. The computer models NIST offers for the collapse of WTC 7, for instance, look just like one would expect them to, for the kind of collapse NIST says occurred there. You first see one load-bearing column fail, leading to the progressive failure of other columns until the entire structure has eventually crumbled. The problem is that these models look absolutely nothing like the actual collapse, documented on video. A simple look at any available footage of the collapse is enough to demonstrate that all major load-bearing columns of the building failed nearly simultaneously. You see the penthouse of the building sinking into the core just seconds before the entire structure, all perimeter columns, fail at precisely the same instant, causing the building to collapse straight down at free-fall acceleration into what should have been the path of greatest resistance according to NIST's own assessment. The similarities to videos of building "implosions" under controlled demolition are astonishing. Yet NIST dismisses the possibility that charges could have been used largely on the basis that, if this had been +the case, there would have been eyewitness reports of the explosions. The problem with this is that there were, in fact, a great many eyewitness reports of explosions, both prior to and during the collapse. NIST also completely ignored the actual leading alternative hypothesis, which was that a substance called thermite (or its U.S. Department of Defense-patented variation, thermate) may have been used to cut the building's columns, rather than, or in conjunction with, traditional explosive demolitions. Evidence for this hypothesis comes not only in form of empirical observation about the actual nature of the collapse from video footage (including the presence of molten steel), but also in traces of what appears to be thermite in the dust from the collapses. Independent scientific inquiries into the collapse have led to the discovery of "distinctive red/gray chips in all of the samples" that, when studied, all showed "marked similarities" and were "found to be an unreacted thermitic material". These findings were included in a report entitled, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" that was published last year in The Open Chemical Physics Journal. Though this report was widely circulated on the internet and among alternative media sources, the Washington Post never bothered to report these findings published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Whatever theories about the events of September 11, 2001 one may subscribe to, what everyone surely can agree upon is that the facts should matter. The editors of the Washington Post might perhaps begin by acknowledging just a few of the more non-controversial facts, including the fact that suspicious trading did occur prior to 9/11, the fact that the identities of at least some of the hijackers has been cast in doubt and that this has never been clarified to the public, and the fact that the collapses of the three WTC buildings has never been adequately investigated. Surely, that proper credible investigations into the events of 9/11 should occur - indeed, should have occurred long ago - should also be non-controversial, no matter which conspiracy theory one believes, whether it belongs to "the lunatic fringe" or to the U.S. government. Jeremy R. Hammond is the editor of Foreign Policy Journal, a website providing news, analysis, and opinion from outside the standard framework provided by government officials and the corporate media. He was among the recipients of the 2010 Project Censored Awards for outstanding investigative journalism and is the author of The Rejection of Palestinian Self-Determination. You can contact him at: jeremy [at] foreignpolicyjournal.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - David Shove shove001 [at] tc.umn.edu rhymes with clove Progressive Calendar over 2225 subscribers as of 12.19.02 please send all messages in plain text no attachments vote third party for president for congress now and forever Socialism YES Capitalism NO To GO DIRECTLY to an item, eg --------8 of x-------- do a find on --8 Research almost any topic raised here at: CounterPunch http://counterpunch.org Dissident Voice http://dissidentvoice.org Common Dreams http://commondreams.org Once you're there, do a search on your topic, eg obama drones
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.