|Progressive Calendar 06.08.06||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: David Shove (shove001tc.umn.edu)|
|Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 05:02:16 -0700 (PDT)|
P R O G R E S S I V E C A L E N D A R 06.08.06 1. StP 2007 budget 6.08 7pm 2. Schultz/950AM 6.09 5pm 3. Alt to violence 6.09-11 6pm 4. Crash/race/film 6.09 6pm 5. GPSP CC 6.09 6:30pm 6. Swede/Greek films 6.09 7pm 7. Gore/warming/film 6.09 8. LWV national 6.09-13 9. PRT/Bakken 6.10 10am 10. Nicaragua 6.10 10am 11. Alt to military 6.10 10:30am 12. Mothers walk 6.10 11am 13. China 6.10 1pm 14. YAWR 6.10 2:30pm 15. Candidate sings 6.10 5pm 16. Democracy/film 6.10 7pm 17. Rwandan music 6.10 7:30pm 18. Holocaust conf 6.10-13 19. Kristen Olson - Green Party MN endorsements 20. Danene Provencher - Signatures required for GP ballot access 21. Dave Edwards - Ridiculing Chavez - Part 1 22. Dave Edwards - Ridiculing Chavez - Part 2 23. Larry Hales - Video games push anti-Chavez propaganda --------1 of 23-------- From: Rosa Maria de la Cueva Peterson <rmdelacp [at] umn.edu> Subject: StP 2007 budget 6.08 7pm [If interested, please SAVE this message. It will not be reprinted here] Mayor Coleman Unveils Public Engagement Campaign to Educate and Gather Feedback on 2007 Budget Options First of all thanks to those responsible at the Mayor's office for all the work and thought that has gone into getting feedback from the community on this matter, and for Bob Hume for letting us know about it providing links to the "budget cruncher." This is a good step to help all of us to understand the complexities and tough choices that need to be made to balance the budget. I hope that Mayor Coleman himself gets the opportunity to be in part of most of the meetings scheduled. Bob Spaulding said: "I am rarely wowed by technology, and have been minding other things lately, but I just visited the City's budget website..." I have to agree with him, except that I was not able to successfully see how the changes I suggested compared to the city's budget. I tried this address <http://www.stpaul.gov/initiatives/budgetcruncher> with three different browsers. I am afraid I am facing a technical glitch in my computer (Mac). I particularly enjoyed the ability to gain more information on a specific budget line--great feature!!! What I found as a greater handicap, though, as I played with different numbers around was the realization that it is hard to increase or decrease amounts without knowing what makes good fiscal policy. I know that for the state to put the burden on cities is not, in my opinion, good policy on the long run. Increase on property taxes may put extra stress on already stretched personal budgets, especially on those in lower-income brackets. My gut feeling to reduce expenses by a certain percentage and increase revenues by a similar amount could achieve reaching a certain common ground, but is it good public policy? Are the taxes indicated make good good public policy? What does St. Paul need to remain and become My question to forum members: Are there any cities that have dealt creatively with budget crisis in a visionary manner taking into account the number of old people/young people/jobs/lack of jobs, etc., predicted for a given city for the the next couple of decades. How we want St. Paul (and the metro are for that matter) to look like in 2025 or 2050 should have an impact on annual budgets. For now, I have put the city's schedule for District Council Meeting below. Mark your calendars, take a friend along that might be interested in learning more or participating more and attend a District Council meeting: 6/8/06 - 7:00p -District 12 - St. Anthony Rec. Center - 890 Cromwell Ave. 6/8/06 - 7:00p -District 14 - Edgecumbe Rec. Center -320 S. Griggs St. 6/8/06 - 7:00p -District 16 - Linwood Rec. Center -860 Saint Clair Ave. 6/12/06 -7:00p -District 9 - Federation Building -974 W. 7th St. 6/12/06 -7:00p -District 3 - WSCO Office -127 W. Winifred Ave. 6/12/06 -7:00p -District 4 -Dayton's Bluff Office -798 E. 7th St. 6/14/06 -7:00p -District 13- Merriam Park Comm. Center- 2000 St Anthony Av 6/20/06 -7:00p -District 6 -North Dale Rec. Center -1414 N Saint Albans St 6/20/06 -8:00p -District 11-Hamline Park -1564 LaFond Ave. 6/21/06 -7:00p -District 2 -Epworth U.M.C. -1961 Sherwood Ave. 6/26/06 -7:00p -District 1 -Conway Rec. Center - 290 Conway St. 6/26/06 -7:00p -District 13 -Skyline Tower -1247 St. Anthony Ave. 6/27/06 -6:30p -District 7 -W. Minnehaha Rec. Center -685 W. Minnehaha Av 6/27/06 -7:00p -District 8 -Hallie Q. Brown / MLK Center -270 Kent St N 7/6/06 -7:00p - District 13 -Bethel Fellowship Hall - Portland Ave. --------2 of 23-------- From: David Schultz <dschultz [at] gw.hamline.edu> Subject: Schultz/950AM 6.09 5pm Fridays from 5:00 - 6:00 PM, David Schultz hosts "Minnesota Matters," on Air America Minnesota radio, 950 AM. Progressive discussion, interviews, and call in. David Schultz, Professor Hamline University Graduate School of Management MS-A1740 1536 Hewitt Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 651.523.2858 (voice) 651.523.3098 (fax) http://davidschultz.efoliomn2.com --------3 of 23-------- From: humanrts [at] umn.edu Subject: Alt to violence 6.09-11 6pm June 9 - Alternatives to Violence Workshop. Time: 6/9 (starts 6 pm) to 6/11 (ends 6 pm). Basic level Alternatives to Violence Workshop, which has been used to reduce violence in Rwanda, Bosnia, Kenya and the U.S. avp [at] fnvw.org FFI: avp [at] fnvw.org Location: Friends for a Nonviolent World, 1050 Selby Ave, St. Paul. --------4 of 23-------- From: Charles Underwood <charleyunderwood [at] hotmail.com> Subject: Crash/race/film 6.09 6pm Friday, 6/9, 6pm, free film "Crash" about racial and social conflicts in L.A., Resource Center of the Americas, 3019 Minnehaha, Mpls. www.americas.org --------5 of 23-------- From: David Shove <shove001 [at] tc.umn.edu> Subject: GPSP CC 6.09 6:30pm 11.28 5pm Green Party of St Paul Coordination Committee (CC) meeting 5pm Sunday, 11.28 Cahoots Coffee House Selby Av 1/2 block E of Snelling in StPaul [Starts one hour later than usual, lasts till 6pm, then moves to event 5 below - ed] --------6 of 23-------- From: Lydia Howell <lhowell [at] visi.com> Subject: Swede/Greek films 6.09 7pm The Oak Street Cinema Returns For Now! As it is in Heaven Opens Fri., June 913, 7 p.m. nightly, June 14-15, 9 p.m. nightly at the Oak Street Cinema Nominated for an Academy Award (Best Foreign Language Film), As It Is In Heaven is the biggest box office hit in Swedish history and it¹s been seen by a million viewers in Germany to date. Voted ³Best of Fest² at Minneapolis-St. Paul Int¹l Film Fest. Zozo Opens Fri., June 913, 9:30 p.m. nightly, June 14-15, 7 p.m. nightly Sat. & Sun. Matinees 5 p.m. at the Oak Street Cinema A new film set in Lebanon about a 10 year old boy forced to emigrate to Sweden. (In Arabic, Swedish, and English subtitles.) Touch of Spice Opens Fri, June 9, runs though June 15 at the Bell Auditorium (17th Street SE & University Avenue) Show times are 7:15 and 9:15 p.m. with matinees on Sat. and Sun. at 5:15 p.m. A new Greek movie about the love of food and sprinkled with the humor of human foibles. Made in the tradition of' Chocolat and Like Water for Chocolate. One of the first U.S. openings. Contact: Vince Muzik (612-331-7563) www.mnfilmarts.org --------7 of 23-------- From: Charles Underwood <charleyunderwood [at] hotmail.com> Subject: Gore/warming/film 6.09 6/9, Al Gore's well-reviewed documentary on global warming "An Inconvenient Truth," Uptown Theater, Mpls. www.landmarktheatres.com --------8 of 23-------- From: erin [at] mnwomen.org Subject: LWV national 6.09-13 Friday, June 9 - Tuesday, June13 National League of Women Voters Convention in Minneapolis. Hilton Minneapolis, 1001 Marquette Ave South. For more information go to www.lwvmpls.org. --------9 of 23-------- From: Margaret Beegle <beegle [at] louberts.com> Subject: PRT/Bakken 6.10 10am Every Saturday in June, Citizens for Personal Rapid Transit will have a display at the Bakken Museum of Electricity, 3537 Zenith Avenue South, Minneapolis. The exhibit is intended for children ages 5 to 12 and on up to adulthood. Hours are 10am-4pm. Come learn about magnetism and the newest developments with PRT. --------10 of 23-------- From: Charles Underwood <charleyunderwood [at] hotmail.com> Subject: Nicaragua 6.10 10am Saturday, 6/10, 10 to 11:30 am, Carlos Rojas talks about Nicaraguan visual art and political muralism, Resource Center of the Americas, 3019 Minnehaha, Mpls. www.americas.org --------11 of 23-------- From: Lydia Howell <lhowell [at] visi.com> Subject: Alt to military 6.10 10:30am SAT.JUNE 6:Alternatives to Military Service Saturday, 6/10 (and 2nd Saturday of each month), 10:30 am, Coalition for Alternatives to Military Service (or CAMS, a counter-recruitment group) meets at Twin Cities Friends Meeting, 1725 Grand, St. Paul. Contact Mary at wamm [at] mtn.org --------12 of 23-------- From: Nancy Nielsen <nancywriter [at] visi.com> Subject: Mothers walk 6.10 11am 2006 Mothers Prayer Walk Fairview Park 621-29th Ave North (at the corner of Lyndale and 29th Ave N) Saturday, June 10, 11am for more information please contact Mary Johnson at 612-501-3512 or Michelle at 612-287-7078 or email twomothers [at] hotmail.com Sponsors: From Death to Life Healing Group, MAD DADS, Village Social Services, Christ English Lutheran Church & Ascension Place -------13 of 23-------- From: akiko tsutsui <tstskk [at] hotmail.com> Subject: China 6.10 1pm China Future Forum and Falun Dafa practitioner Dr. Wang Wenyi Tienanmen Students Massacre Commemorative event by Minnesota Democratic China foundation. It has been forty years since Mao launched the Cultural Revolution. Where is China now-has it undergone major changes during the past four decades? Is China on the road to being a world superpower with a prospering economy? Or is China's progress held back by political and religious persecutions carried out by the Chinese Communist Party? At this crucial time in history, China is currently at a crossroad. What will happen in the next phase of history to China's social, political and economic systems? Will China ever transition into a democratic country? These issues and more will be addressed at the China Future Forum held on June 10 at the University of Minnesota. The forum is open to the public and all attendees are welcomed to speak and offer insight. This event is sponsored by the Federation for a Democratic China. Featured speakers include Ms. Wang Wenyi, who confronted Chinese president Hu Jintao at the White House, Mr. Tao Ye, the president of Minnesota Democratic China Foundation, and renowned commentator Zhang Tianliang. 1-5pm Saturday, 6/10 Minnesota Commons, St. Paul Student Center, U of M 2017 Buford Ave, St. Paul, MN 55108 For more information, please contact Yao Yongzhan Telephone: 952-393-9095 Email: usa_fdc [at] yaoo.com --------14 of 23-------- From: Charles Underwood <charleyunderwood [at] hotmail.com> Subject: YAWR 6.10 2:30pm Saturday, 6/10, 2:30 pm, meeting of Youth Against War and Racism coordinating committee, Resource Center of the Americas, 3019 Minnehaha Ave, Mpls. 612-760-1980. --------15 of 23-------- From: Susan Kolstad <s.horns [at] yahoo.com> Subject: Candidate sings 6.10 5pm [Can a Green Party candidate for MN Attorney General play and sing? You be the judge. Caution: hecklers may be prosecuted. -ed] Papa John (AG?) Kolstad with Clint Hoover June 10, 2006 between 5 and 6:30 Famous Dave's Blues Festival Juke Joint Stage Peavy Plaza Minneapolis Road To Memphis Competition with Clint Hoover June 11, 2006 around 6:00 PM Gingko Coffeehouse 651-645-2647 721 N Snelling Av St Paul, MN 55104 Jacksons Juke Joint with Clint Hoover (IF ALL GOES WELL,THIS WILL BE THE CD RELEASE PARTY FOR THE CD RECORDED AT THE GINGKO)= June 14, 2006 7:00 PM Viking Bar 612-332-4259 1829 Riverside Ave Minneapolis, MN --------16 of 23-------- From: Lydia Howell <lhowell [at] visi.com> Subject: Democracy/film 6.10 7pm BREWING DEMOCRACY a new documentary by Beth Peloff SAT JUNE 10, 7pm film screening with reception to follow: http://www.artofthis.net/ar.mbr.htm ART OF THIS 3222 Bloomington Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55407 612.721.4105 www.artofthis.net --------17 of 23-------- From: Stephen Feinstein <feins001 [at] umn.edu> Subject: Rwandan music 6.10 7:30pm Concert of Rwandan Music June 10, 2006 CHGS and Institute for Global Studies has arranged a concert of Rwandan music with Jean Paul Samputu as the performer with a back-up band. Event will be held at Coffman Union Theater 7:30pm Tickets are $15. More information can be found at www.nibakure.org Event sponsored by: "Nibakure Children's Village". Contact: Floriane Robins-Brown or 612-578-6560 for advance tickets. --------18 of 23-------- From: Charles Underwood <charleyunderwood [at] hotmail.com> Subject: Holocaust conf 6.10-13 6/10 to 6/13, annual conference of Association of Holocaust Organizations, Doubletree Park Place Hotel, 1500 Park Place Blvd, Minneapolis. www.hrusa.org.calendar or www. ahoinfo.org --------19 of 23-------- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 17:20:22 EDT From: Krisrose02 [at] aol.com Subject: GPMN Endorsements -- Press Release GREEN PARTY OF MINNESOTA ENDORSES CANDIDATES FOR STATEWIDE, FEDERAL OFFICES Endorsed Candidates to Hold Press Conference 10 a.m. Wednesday, June 14, on the State Capitol Stairs. Contact: Rhoda Gilman, Green Party of Minnesota Politics Chair, 651-224-6383, rhodagilman [at] earthlink.net Minneapolis, Minnesota -- Minnesota Green Party members gathered Saturday, June 3, in Duluth for their biennial convention and voted to endorse candidates for U.S. Senate, Governor and Attorney General. The Greens endorsed Michael Cavlan for the U.S. Senate seat now held by Senator Mark Dayton. Cavlan is a registered nurse, and an activist in the peace and justice movement. Cavlan's platform focuses on creating a Universal Single-Payer Healthcare system, ending the war on Iraq, realigning U.S. foreign policy to better address the roots of terrorism, ensuring transparency and accountability of elections and voting technologies, implementing sustainable energy and agricultural policies, and protecting and empowering local family farms and small businesses. "Working class people and members of the peace and justice community must have a voice in our society and in the political system," Cavlan said, "Corporate money must be removed as an influence in our government. We will work to preserve and rekindle our democracy." Greens also endorsed Ken Pentel for Governor. Pentel was the Green Party's gubernatorial candidate in 1998 and in 2002. Pentel has spent the last 20 years working for environmental protection and social justice as an organizer, speaker, lobbyist, and candidate. Pentel's platform includes implementing a statewide Single-Payer Universal Healthcare system, establishing a living wage, improving access to affordable housing, and education. "I am running to give voice to the ways we can sustain our relationships to the Earth and to each other," Pentel said. "The state of Minnesota can be a leader in sustainable, renewable energy, preventing toxic pollution, and local-sustainable organic farming. I plan to also speak clearly on the need to implement policy that will take the influence of big money out of our democratic process such as, Proportional Representation, Instant Run-off Voting, publicly funded elections, and lobby reform." The Greens endorsed small business owner John Kolstad for Minnesota Attorney General. John Kolstad is currently President of Mill City Music, and has been active in many civic, business and community organizations for the last 25 years. Kolstad is currently serving as the Chair of the Minnesota Universal Health Care Coalition (www.muhcc.org) Steering committee, whose goal is to bring Universal Single Payer Health Insurance to MN. Kolstad supports a Single Payer style health plan, affordable housing, instituting strong enforceable environmental laws in MN, Campaign Finance Reform, Instant Run-off Voting, Proportional Representation, and ending Corporate Welfare. Speaking on the Healthcare crisis in Minnesota, Kolstad says, "What amazes me is what lengths public and elected officials will go to NOT solve the health care crises. I have no doubt that I can manage the affairs of the AG's Office and fully live up to the expectation of the State Constitution and the people of MN." Green Party member Dave Berger will be seeking the party's endorsement for Minnesota State Auditor. "I have come to realize that we cannot promote a balanced and sustainable planet unless we have balance within our own lives." Berger says. "I promise that I will do all that I can to represent the people with dignity and respect. Respect for social justice, grassroots democracy, environmental wisdom, and security through nonviolence." In local elections, the Greens have endorsed candidates Julie Risser for State Senate District 41, Jesse Mortenson for State House Representative 64A, Jay Pond for U.S. Representative in the 5th Congressional District, Farheen Hakeem for Hennepin County Commissioner (District 4) and Kristen Olson for Roseville City Council. Green Party member Leroy Schafer is running for St. Francis City Council. Wade Hannon is also seeking Green Party endorsement for U.S. Congress in the 7th Congressional District. All of the candidates will be available to address the media at a joint press conference on Wednesday, June 14, at 10:00 am on the State Capitol stairs. The Green Party of Minnesota is founded on the values of Grassroots Democracy, Non-Violence, Ecological Wisdom, and Social and Economic Justice. For more information on the Minnesota Green Party see:www.mngreens.org For more information on the candidates see: Farheen Hakeem for Hennepin County Commissioner www.farheenhakeem.org Jesse Mortenson for MN House District 64A _www.jessemortenson.com_ (http://www.jessemortenson.com) Julie Risser for MN Senate District 41 _www.voterisser4senate.com_ (http://www.voterisser4senate.com) Michael Cavlan for US Senate _www.cavlan.org_ (_http://www.cavlan.org_ (http://www.cavlan.org/) ) Jay Pond, US House of Representatives, Minnesotaâ's 5th Congressional _www.JayPond.com (http://www.JayPond.com --------20 of 23-------- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 23:28:15 EDT From: Danene Provencher PRO826 [at] aol.com Subject: Signatures required for GP ballot access Due to the fact that we are no longer a major party, we must collect signatures on the nominating petitions for each of our 9 candidates (Wade Hannon, US Congress Dist 7 and Dave Berger, MN Auditor are pending endorsements) with in a two week period (July 4-18) to be placed on the November MN Ballot. The breakdown for the required number of signatures is: US Senate, MN Governor, MN Auditor, MN Attorney General -2000 for each candidate US Congress (2 positions, CD5 and CD7) - 1000 for each candidate MN Senate, MN House, Henn Co. Commissioner - 500 for each candidate This is a total of 11,500 VALID signatures to get our candidates placed on the November MN Ballot. We are going to shoot for double the number since some signatures may be disqualified for ineligibility, wrong district, etc. In 2004 the Nader campaign collected over 4,600 valid signatures (2000 required) and the Democrats tried to contest it. I hope that the Greens won't encounter the same anti-democratic attitude. Democracy is not a choice of two, Danene Provencher 952-994-3085 GPM Coordinated Campaign Committee Ballot Access Coordinator --------21 of 23-------- Ridiculing Chavez - Part 1 By Dave Edwards ZNet Commentary May 21, 2006 http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2006-05/20edwards.cfm Controlling what we think is not solely about controlling what we know - it is also about controlling who we respect and who we find ridiculous. Thus we find that Western leaders are typically reported without adjectives preceding their names. George Bush is simply "US president George Bush". Condoleeza Rice is "the American secretary of state Condoleeza Rice". Tony Blair is just "the British prime minister". The leader of Venezuela, by contrast, is "controversial left-wing president Hugo Chavez" for the main BBC TV news. (12:00, May 14, 2006). He is as an "extreme left-winger," while Bolivian president Evo Morales is "a radical socialist", according to Jonathan Charles on BBC Radio 4. (6 O'Clock News, May 12, 2006) Imagine the BBC introducing the US leader as "controversial right-wing president George Bush", or as an "extreme right-winger". Is Bush - the man who illegally invaded Iraq on utterly fraudulent pretexts - +less+ controversial than Chavez? Is Bush less far to the right of the political spectrum than Chavez is to the left? For the Independent on Sunday, Chavez is "Venezuela's outspoken President". (Stephen Castle and Raymond Whitaker, 'Heralding the end of US imperialism,' May 14, 2006) For the Mirror, he is a "controversial leader" called "'the Crackers from Caracas' by his own supporters". (Rosa Prince, 'He calls Bush "Hitler" and Blair "the pawn",' May 16, 2006) He is an "aggressively populist left-wing leader", the Times writes. (Richard Owen, 'Pope tells Chavez to mend his ways,' May 12, 2006) He is a "left-wing firebrand," the Independent reports. (Guy Adams, 'Pandora: 'Chavez stirs up a degree of controversy at Oxford,' May 15, 2006) He is a "Left wing firebrand" according to the Evening Standard. (Pippa Crerar, 'Chavez to meet the Mayor,' May 12, 2006) He is an "international revolutionary firebrand", according to the Observer. (Peter Beaumont, 'The new kid in the barrio,' May 7, 2006) A Guardian news report describes Chavez as nothing less than "the scourge of the United States". (Duncan Campbell and Jonathan Steele,' The Guardian, May 15, 2006) Although this was a news report, not a comment piece, the title featured the required tone of mockery: "Revolution in the Camden air as Chavez - with amigo Ken - gets a hero's welcome". An Independent report declared of Chavez: "He has been described as a fearless champion of the oppressed poor against the corrupt rich and their American sponsors. But also as a dangerous demagogue subsidising totalitarian regimes with his country's oil wells." (Kim Sengupta, 'Britain's left-wing "aristocracy" greet their hero Chavez,' The Independent, May 15, 2006) Imagine an Independent news report providing a similarly 'balanced' description of Bush or Blair using language of the kind employed in the second sentence. Again, mockery was a central theme: "And yesterday in the People's Republic of Camden the villains remained very much President George W Bush, his acolyte Tony Blair, big business and the forces of reaction." Younger readers may have missed the BBC's prime time TV series Citizen Smith (1977-80), which lampooned a fictional organisation called The Tooting Popular Front, consisting of six die-hard Marxist losers, and its deluded dreams of achieving radical change. This is a favourite media theme - pouring scorn on popular movements is an absolute must for mainstream journalism. Thus Richard Beeston reported in The Times this week: "Hugo Chavez's Latin American bandwagon descended on London yesterday, briefly enlivening a dull Sunday in Camden with the sound of drums, the cries of revolution and the waving of banners. "At the start of his controversial two-day visit to London, the Venezuelan President succeeded in attracting an eclectic group of supporters ranging from elderly CND activists to young anti-globalisation campaigners, members of the Socialist Workers' Party and even the odd Palestinian protester." (Beeston, 'Chavez fails to paint the town red in Camden,' The Times, May 15, 2006) This recalled the Observer's September 2002 account of what, at the time, had been London's greatest anti-war march in a generation. Euan Ferguson wrote: "It was back to the old days, too, in terms of types. All the oldies and goodies were there. The Socialist Workers' Party, leafleting outside Temple Tube station by 11 am. ('In this edition: Noam Chomsky in Socialist Worker!'). CND, and ex-Services CND. The Scottish Socialist Party. 'Scarborough Against War and Globalisation', which has a lovely ring of optimism to it, recalling the famous Irish provincial leader column in 1939: 'Let Herr Hitler be warned, the eyes of the Skibereen Eagle are upon him.' Many, many Muslim groups, and most containing women and children, although some uneasy thoughts pass through your mind when you see a line of pretty six-year-old black-clad Muslim toddlers walking ahead of the megaphone chanting 'George Bush, we know you/Daddy was a killer too,' and singing about Sharon and Hitler." (Ferguson, 'A big day out in Leftistan,' The Observer, September 29, 2002) The emphasis, again, was on the absurdity of a ragtag army of Citizen Smith-style oddballs who imagined they could somehow make a difference to a real world run by 'serious' people. The idea is that the public should roll their eyes and shake their heads in embarrassment at such delusions - and turn away. Hidden far out of sight are the life and death issues motivating such protests - in 2002 the marchers were, after all, attempting to prevent a war that has since killed and mutilated hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians. It is not inconceivable that if British and American journalists like Ferguson had emphasised the desperate importance and urgency of the anti-war protests, rather than sneering at them, those civilians might still be alive today. Similarly, the press has barely hinted at the unimaginable horror and desperate hopes buried beneath the mocking of Chavez - namely, the suffering of Latin American people under very real Western economic and military violence. The Independent on Sunday managed this vague mention: "Mr Morales was, the Venezuelan President said, a direct descendant of an indigenous Latin American people, adding: 'These are oppressed people who are rising. They are rising with peace, not weapons. Europe should listen to that.'" (Stephen Castle and Raymond Whitaker, 'Chavez on tour,' Independent on Sunday, May 14, 2006) The tragedy out of which these people are arising, and how their hopes of a better life have been systematically crushed by Western force in the past, was of course not explored. The Guardian also managed a tiny reference to the reality: "His [Chavez's] unabashed opposition to US foreign policy, and the pressure it has produced from Washington, tap into the deep vein of suspicion and resentment that two centuries of US invasions, coups, and economic domination have aroused in Latin America and the Caribbean." (Jonathan Steele and Duncan Campbell, 'The world according to Chavez,' The Guardian, May 16, 2006) But that was it. As the Guardian writers know full well, these comments appear in a context of almost complete public ignorance of just what the United States has done to Latin America - a subject to which we will return in Part 2. In 2004, the American media watch site, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) reported that a search of major US newspapers turned up the phrase "death squad" just five times in connection with former US president Ronald Reagan in the days following his death in June 2004 - twice in commentaries and twice in letters to the editor. Remarkably, only one news article mentioned death squads as part of Reagan's legacy. (Media Advisory: 'Reagan: Media Myth and Reality,' June 9, 2004, www.fair.org) As we have discussed elsewhere, US-backed death squads brought hell to Latin America under Reagan. (see our Media Alerts: 'Reagan - Visions Of The Damned': http://www.medialens.org/alerts/04/040610_Reagan_Visions_1.HTM and http://www.medialens.org/alerts/04/040615_Reagan_Visions_2.HTM.) Quite simply the British and American press do not cover the West's mass killing of Latin Americans. Radical, Maverick, Firebrands - The Subliminal Smears A Daily Telegraph comment piece continued the pan-media smearing of Chavez: "Now the anticipation is over, and today, flush with six trillion dollars worth of oil reserves, Hugo Chavez, president of Venezuela, flies in to fill the despot-of-the-month slot at London mayor Ken Livingstone's lunch table." (William Langley, 'Welcome to the El Presidente show,' The Daily Telegraph, May 14, 2006) The Independent on Sunday (IoS) wrote: "An icon of the anti-globalisation movement, Mr Chavez's brand of aggressive socialism is taken seriously because of his country's vast oil resources." (Stephen Castle and Raymond Whitaker, 'Chavez on tour,' Independent on Sunday, May 14, 2006) We wait in vain for an IoS news report referring to Bush and Blair's "brand" of "aggressive" and in fact "militant" capitalism - this would be biased news reporting, after all. Likewise, the suggestion that Bush and Blair's aggressive support for "democracy" is taken seriously only because of their economic and military power. The Observer noted that Chavez has a "growing regional profile", which is "built on a mix of populist rhetoric and his country's oil wealth". The report added that Chavez "has been publicly feuding with Bush, whom he has likened to Adolf Hitler - with Tony Blair dismissed as 'the main ally of Hitler.'" ('Chavez offers oil to Europe's poor,' The Observer, May 14, 2006) In responding to similar comments in the Times, Julia Buxton of the University of Bradford has been all but alone in providing some background: "To place this statement in context, Chavez was compared to Adolf Hitler by the US Secretary of State for Defence, Donald Rumsfeld, during a visit to Paraguay. President Chavez rejected the comparison and countered that if any individual were comparable to Hitler, it would be President Bush." (See Buxton's excellent analysis here: http://www.vicuk.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=85&Itemid=29) The Times' 'Pandora' diary column wrote: "Ken Livingstone has invited the Venezuelan President, Hugo Chavez, to lunch at City Hall. Even by the London Mayor's standards, it's a provocative gesture - Chavez has a controversial record on human rights - and several guests have refused to attend." (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,6-2171200,00.html) Channel 4 News asked of Chavez: "Is he a hero of the left or a villain in disguise?" For the media, of course, a "hero of the left" +is+ a "villian in disguise", so viewers were in effect being asked if Chavez was a villain or a villain. Like many other media, Channel 4 patronised the Venezuelan president as "a global poster boy for the left". The same programme later asked if he was "a hero of the left or a scoundrel of all democrats?" In similar vein, Daniel Howden observed in the Independent: "Not surprisingly for a man who divides the world, Hugo Chavez is greeted as a saviour or a saboteur wherever he goes. The Venezuelan President seems immune to nuance and perfectly able to reduce the world to Chavistas or to Descualdos, the 'squalid ones' as his supporters dismiss those who try to depose him." (Dowden, 'Hugo Chavez: Venezualean [sic] leader divides world opinion. But who is he, and what is he up to in Britain?' The Independent, May 13, 2006) The reference to a lack of "nuance" is a coded smear with which regular readers will be familiar. Chavez is in good company. Steve Crawshaw wrote in the Independent: "Chomsky knows so much... but seems impervious to any idea of nuance." (Crawshaw, 'Furious ideas with no room for nuance,' The Independent, February 21, 2001) The BBC's former director of news, Richard Sambrook, told the Hutton inquiry that BBC journalist Andrew Gilligan had failed to appreciate the "nuances and subtleties" of broadcast journalism. (Matt Wells, Richard Norton-Taylor and Vikram Dodd, 'Gilligan left out in cold by BBC,' The Guardian, September 18, 2003) Channel 4 news presenter Jon Snow wrote in the Guardian of John Pilger: "Some argue the ends justify [Pilger's] means, others that the world is a more subtle place than he allows." (Snow, 'Still angry after all these years,' The Guardian, February 25, 2001) In 2002, Bill Hayton, a BBC World Service editor, advised us at Media Lens: "If your language was more nuanced it would get a better reception." (Email to Editors, November 16, 2002) The Channel 4 programme cited above went on to describe the Iraqi cleric Moqtadr al Sadr by his official media title: "the radical cleric Moqtadr al Sadr". Likewise, the media invariably refer to "the militant group Hamas". The media would of course never dream of referring to "radical prime minister Tony Blair" or to "the militant Israeli Defence Force". The reason was unconsciously expressed by Channel 4 news presenter Alex Thomson in response to a Media Lens reader who had suggested, reasonably, that "a terrorist is one who brings terror to another person". Thomson responded: "Your definition of a terrorist as one bringing terror is nonsensical as it would encompass all military outfits from al Qaeda to the Royal Fusilliers." (Forwarded to Media Lens, February 25, 2005) It is inconceivable to the mainstream media that Western armies could be responsible for terrorism, no matter how much terror they actually create. Likewise, it is inconceivable that Western leaders could be described as "militant" or "fundamentalist". This indicates that these adjectives are smear words - they mean, approximately, 'bad'. More specifically, they mean 'a threat to Western interests,' which is why, by definition, they cannot be used to refer +to+ the West. The use and non-use of these words shepherd viewers and readers towards the idea that leaders like Bush and Blair are reasonable, rational, respectable figures who must be described with colourless, neutral language. The deeper implication - all the more powerful because it is unstated, almost subliminal - is that figures like Hugo Chavez and Evo Morales do not merit balanced 'professional' media treatment - the rules do not apply to them because they are beyond the pale. Because almost all journalists repeat this bias - and because the public imagine journalists are simply well-informed, independent observers who just happen to reach the same conclusions on who is worthy of respect - the impression given is that the media consensus is the only sane view in town. Before we know it, we find ourselves accepting the corporate media view as our own. If we see enough journalists smearing "maverick", "controversial", "left-wing", "Gorgeous George" Galloway, we will likely find ourselves responding: 'I can't stand that guy!' But how many of us will really know why, beyond feeling that there is 'something about him I don't like'? And how many of us will have reflected that, of all MPs, Galloway has at least been uniquely honest in his opposition to the Iraq war? As for that other "maverick Chavez" (Sunday Times, February 19, 2006), the Financial Times noted that he was invited to London by Ken Livingstone: "London's maverick mayor." (David Lehmann, 'Why we should bother about Chavez and his politics,' May 15, 2006) In Part 2 we will examine the realities of Western political, economic and military violence in Latin America - realities that are consistently ignored by the corporate media. --------22 of 23-------- ZNet Commentary Ridiculing Chavez - Part 2 June 01, 2006 By Dave Edwards In Part 1 of this alert we showed how the mainstream media have been united in depicting Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez as an extreme, absurd and threatening figure. In essence, the public has been urged to consider Chavez beyond the pale of respectable politics. As John Pilger has observed, British media attacks "resemble uncannily those of the privately owned Venezuelan television and press, which called for the elected government to be overthrown". (Pilger, 'Chavez is a threat because he offers the alternative of a decent society,' The Guardian, May 13, 2006; http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1773908,00.html) We focused mainly on news reports, skipping many of the more madcap comment pieces. Aleksander Boyd, for example, wrote in the Times of how: "The Venezuelan President aligns himself with dictators, human rights abusers and notorious narcoterrorists." (Boyd, 'Guess who's coming to dinner with Red Ken?,' The Times, May 9, 2006) No surprise, then, to learn that in thrall to this monster: "Venezuela has ceased to be a real democracy: it now exists instead in the murky twilight world between democracy and dictatorship, where there is still a free press and a nod to holding elections." (Ibid) In fact Chavez is one of the world's most popular heads of state. Boyd has been quoted and heard elsewhere - in The Sun and on BBC Radio 2, for example. Julia Buxton of the University of Bradford responded in a letter to the Times: "Mr Boyd has been linked to threats of violence against people working and writing on Venezuelan related issues for the past few years. He has also organised disruptive protest actions that have undermined public security and he has published libellous and inflammatory articles on Islam, Middle Eastern and South American politics." (http://www.vicuk.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=85&Itemid=29) It might be argued that media reporting simply reflects a dismal reality - perhaps Chavez +is+ irresponsible. But in fact the current media smear reveals more about power relations in Britain than it does about politics in Venezuela. In 1992, Jeff Cohen of the US media watch site Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) described media coverage afforded to one important Western ally: "During that whole period when the United States was helping build up the military and economic might of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, the issue of his human rights abuses was off the media agenda. There was this classic in the New York Post, a tabloid in New York. After the  crisis began, they had a picture of Saddam Hussein patting the British kid on the head and their banner headline was 'Child Abuser'. That was very important to us [at FAIR] and very ironic, because Amnesty International and other human rights groups had released studies in 1984 and 1985 which showed that Saddam Hussein's regime regularly tortured children to get information about their parents' views. That just didn't get the coverage. "It shows one of the points FAIR has made constantly: that when a foreign government is in favour with the United States, with the White House, its human rights record is basically off the mainstream media agenda, and when they do something that puts them out of favour with the US government, the foreign government's human rights abuses are, all of a sudden, major news." (Quoted, David Barsamian, Stenographers To Power, Common Courage Press, 1992, p.142) In a review of press reporting on Iran under the mass murdering Shah - a Western ally installed and armed by Britain and America - William A. Dorman and Ehsan Omad noted: "We have been unable to find a single example of a news and feature story in the American mainstream press that uses the label 'dictator'." (Dorman and Omad, 'Reporting Iran the Shah's Way,' Columbia Journalism Review, January-February 1979) British media performance is close to identical, as we have documented many times. Of the hundreds of media reports on Chavez in recent weeks, almost none have depicted events in Venezuela as a fundamentally positive and urgently needed attempt to improve the condition of impoverished people. In a rare exception, John Pilger wrote in the Guardian: "Mavis Mendez has seen, in her 95 years, a parade of governments preside over the theft of tens of billions of dollars in oil spoils, much of it flown to Miami, together with the steepest descent into poverty ever known in Latin America; from 18% in 1980 to 65% in 1995, three years before ChÃ¡vez was elected. 'We didn't matter in a human sense,' she said. 'We lived and died without real education and running water, and food we couldn't afford. When we fell ill, the weakest died. In the east of the city, where the mansions are, we were invisible, or we were feared. Now I can read and write my name, and so much more; and whatever the rich and their media say, we have planted the seeds of true democracy, and I am full of joy that I have lived to witness it.'" (Pilger, op. cit) Almost nothing of this has been reported elsewhere. Do the journalists of our corporate press just not care about people like Mavis Mendez? Does it not matter to them that Chavez is, as Pilger writes, "a threat, especially to the United States... the threat of a good example in a continent where the majority of humanity has long suffered a Washington-designed peonage"? (Ibid) In all the voluminous coverage, there has been close to zero analysis of why so many Latin Americans living in resource-rich countries have been so poor for so long. The role of the West in this catastrophe has been essentially invisible. Instead, a remarkable leader in the Independent on Sunday observed: "Mr Chavez is an unabashed admirer of Fidel Castro, which gives his attachment to democracy a temporary and improvised feel. As do the human rights abuses of which the Venezuelan government is guilty. "Most sinister of all, perhaps, is Mr Chavez's use of anti-US sentiment to create an external threat in the classic gambit of the tyrant. As we reported recently, he has formed a militia of ordinary Venezuelan citizens to mobilise against the threat of an 'invasion' by unspecified enemies. That is not the sane or balanced action of a committed democrat." (Leader, 'Why Hugo Chavez is no hero,' Independent on Sunday, May 14, 2006) Can it be that the media ingenues at the Independent on Sunday are completely unaware of the reality of Latin American politics? Killing Hope - Of Jackals And Economic Hit Men In his book, Confessions Of An Economic Hit Man, John Perkins describes the role he played in the West's devastation of the Third World for profit, Latin America very much included. Perkins compares himself to the slave traders of colonial times: "I had been the heir of those slavers who had marched into African jungles and hauled men and women off to waiting ships. Mine had been a more modern approach, subtler - I never had to see the dying bodies, smell the rotting flesh, or hear the screams of agony." (Perkins, Confessions Of An Economic Hit Man, Ebury Press, 2005, p.148; http://www.johnperkins.org/) In January 1971, Perkins was hired by American big business to forecast economic growth in Third World countries. These forecasts were used to justify massive international loans, which funded engineering and construction projects, so funnelling money back to US corporations while enriching a small Third World elite. Perkins explains that his real task - rarely discussed but always understood in high government and business circles - was to deliberately exaggerate growth forecasts in countries like Peru, Ecuador, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia. The goal was for these countries to +fail+ to achieve their inflated targets and so be unable to repay their loans. The point being, as Perkins writes, that Third World leaders would then "become ensnared in a web of debt that ensures their loyalty". As a result, American interests "can draw on them whenever we desire - to satisfy our political, economic, or military needs. In turn, they bolster their political positions by bringing industrial parks, power plants, and airports to their people. The owners of US engineering and construction companies become fabulously wealthy". (Ibid, p.xi) The "needs" include military bases, votes at the UN, cheap access to oil and other human and natural resources. Perkins describes this as a non-military means for achieving "the most subtle and effective form of imperialism the world has ever known". (Ibid, p.139) Bankrupt debtor countries have thus been forced to spend much of their national wealth simply on repaying these debts even as their people sicken and die from malnutrition and poverty. For example, international banks dominated by Washington loaned Ecuador billions of dollars from the 1970s onwards so that it could hire engineering and construction firms to improve life for the rich. In the space of thirty years, poverty grew from 50 to 60 per cent, under- or unemployment increased from 15 to 70 per cent, public debt increased from $240 million to $16 billion, and the share of national resources allocated to the poor fell from 20 per cent to 6 per cent. Today, Ecuador is required to devote nearly 50 per cent of its national budget to debt repayment - leaving almost no resources for millions of citizens classified as "dangerously impoverished". Out of every $100 worth of oil pumped from the Amazon, less than $3 goes to Ecuadorian people dying from lack of food and potable water. Perkins is clear that, waiting in the wings should the economic hit men (EHMs) fail, are the real hit men - "the jackals". He writes of Jaime Roldas, president of Ecuador, and Omar Torrijos, president of Panama, who both died in plane crashes: "Their deaths were not accidental. They were assassinated because they opposed that fraternity of corporate, government, and banking heads whose goal is global empire. We EHMs failed to bring Roldas and Torrijos around, and the other type of hit men, the CIA-sanctioned jackals who were always right behind us, stepped in." (Ibid, p.ix) Perkins writes of Rolda's death in May 1981: "It had all the markings of a CIA-orchestrated assassination. I understood that it had been executed so blatantly in order to send a message. The new Reagan administration, complete with its fast-draw Hollywood cowboy image, was the ideal vehicle for delivering such a message. The jackals were back, and they wanted Omar Torrijos and everyone else who might consider joining an anti-corporate crusade to know it." (Ibid, p.158) Torrijos was killed just two months later. This is the likely fate that awaits Chavez, Morales, and other Third World leaders currently being ridiculed by the British press. The last fifty years have seen a vast bloodbath as Washington has funnelled money, weapons and supplies to client dictators and right-wing death squads battling independent nationalism across Latin America. Britain's only left-wing daily newspaper, the Morning Star - with a tiny circulation of between 13,000-14,000 - is a lone voice describing some of these horrors. Dr Francisco Dominguez, head of the Centre for Brazilian and Latin American Studies at Middlesex University, writes: "Military dictatorship, death squads, torture, assassination, economic blockade, economic genocide, military intervention, wanton repression, corruption and every other means intrinsic to capitalist and imperialist 'management techniques' has been utilised to secure the profits of primarily US multinationals and the wealth of the privileged few. Mass unemployment and mass poverty are just two extra means with which to obtain compliance with the economic and political pillage of the continent." (Dominguez, 'Latin America takes centre stage,' Morning Star, November 22, 2005) John Pilger adds: "In the US media in the 1980s, the 'threat' of tiny Nicaragua was seriously debated until it was crushed. Venezuela is clearly being 'softened up' for something similar. A US army publication, Doctrine for Asymmetric War against Venezuela, describes Chavez and the Bolivarian revolution as the 'largest threat since the Soviet Union and Communism'." (Pilger, op., cit) Who benefits? The answer is provided by Professor William Domhoff of the University of California at Santa Cruz in his study 'Wealth, Income, and Power In the United States'. Domhoff reports that as of 2001, the top 1% of US households owned 33.4% of all privately held wealth, and the next 19% had 51%, indicating that just 20% of the people owned 84%, leaving only 16% of the wealth for the bottom 80%. In terms of financial wealth, the top 1% of households had an even greater share: 39.7%. In terms of types of financial wealth, the top 1 percent of households have 44.1% of all privately held stock, 58.0% of financial securities, and 57.3% of business equity. The top 10% have 85% to 90% of stock, bonds, trust funds, and business equity, and over 75% of non-home real estate. Domhoff comments: "Since financial wealth is what counts as far as the control of income-producing assets, we can say that just 10% of the people own the United States of America." (G. William Domhoff, 'Wealth, Income, and Power In The United States,' February 2006; http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html) These fabulously wealthy elites own politics, they own the media, they control what the American people know, see and think. In Britain, the top 5% of the British population own 45% of the nation's wealth - they also run politics, the economy and the media in their own interests. Naturally, then, elite journalists reflexively declare that the United States and Britain are passionately intent on bringing democracy to the world. A recent BBC radio talk show asked: "Are 100 British soldiers' lives too high a price to pay for democracy in Iraq?" (BBC Radio Five Live) This, despite the fact that the income ratio of the one-fifth of the world's population in the wealthiest countries to the one-fifth in the poorest countries went from 30 to 1 in 1960 to 74 to 1 in 1995. Despite achieving bestseller status by word of mouth, Perkins' account has been all but ignored by the mainstream British press since its publication last year, receiving mentions in just four articles. In one of these, a Sunday Times reviewer wrote: "One measure of the success of an author is whether his book passes the 'laugh out loud' test. John Perkins's had me in stitches. The problem is, it is not meant to." (David Charters, 'A miss not a hit,' Sunday Times, March 5, 2006) Cynically ignoring the issues and evidence, Charters dismissed the book as "ridiculous": "If it was not so laughable, it could be depressing." The book has received similar treatment in the US press. We should be under no illusions. The corporate media oppose Chavez because the corporate system is viscerally opposed to policies that are unleashing democratic hopes in Venezuela. It takes a moment's thought to understand that greater democracy, equality, justice and popular empowerment are +not+ in the interests of a system built on exploitation. As John Perkins comments of the media: "Things are not as they appear... Our media is part of the corporatocracy. The officers and directors who control nearly all our communications outlets know their places; they are taught throughout life that one of their most important jobs is to perpetuate, strengthen, and expand the system they have inherited. They are very efficient at doing so, and when opposed, they can be ruthless." (Perkins, op. cit, p.221) As long as we support this corporate media system - as long as we hand over our money for its product, for its phoney 'balance' and subliminal smears - it will continue to subordinate the welfare of millions of human beings to corporate greed. --------23 of 23-------- Video games push imperialist propaganda as poverty drops in Venezuela By Larry Hales Workers World - Jun 8, 2006 issue http://www.workers.org/2006/world/venezuela-0608/ Video-game makers Lucasarts and Pandemic have announced the sequel to the hugely popular "Mercenary" game. It will be titled "Mercenaries 2: World in Flames," and is to be based on fictional events unfolding in Venezuela. The makers of "Mercenaries 2" describe the game as "an explosive open-world action game" in which "a power-hungry tyrant messes with Venezuela's oil supply, sparking an invasion that turns the country into a war zone." The first "Mercenary" game was equally provocative. The action took place in a North Korea that was supposedly run by a "tyrant." In both games players run around as guns for hire, but with an agenda that fits the mold of what the imperialist powers deem as important to furthering "democracy" and the free flow of capital. These games are not the first to openly state the U.S. imperialists' desires or aims. Tom Clancy, the war hawk historian, who has written fictions on the U.S. intelligence services that detail his insider status as well as histories of the 82nd Airborne Division and other military outfits, has developed three different lines of games. One of them was "Ghost Recon: Island Thunder." Part of the game's write-up features this: "Cuba. Ripe with randy women, hairy men, some of the world's best cigars, rainforests, beaches, and a dictator who's managed to stay in power for a little over 40 years." The racist, sexist disdain for the Cuban people is clear. Then the propaganda gets even more to the point: "In the near future, Fidel Castro is dead. Cuba has decided to hold free elections once again and move itself into the future and away from the long Communist rule. World authorities are asked to intervene and make sure that everything runs smoothly. While the world sits back and looks in on the events proceeding in Cuba, some startling discoveries are made that point to a group of rebels in the hills thought to be under the control of drug dealers and bandits looking to disrupt the process and seize power for themselves, returning Cuba to a dictatorial state once again." These are not esoteric games that reach the hands of a sparse population. The video-game industry has eclipsed the motion picture industry. Its 2003 profits totaled around $10 billion. These games, like other propaganda from capitalist media, constitute psychological warfare. Facts about Venezuela denied The newest game is a major provocation on Venezuela, in a line that leads back to the 2001 coup attempt, which was openly funded by the United States, and the Venezuelan bosses' oil strike that followed. There couldn't be a wider gap between the facts and the game's premise. Not only has Venezuelan President Chavez won election after election, but he has followed the mandate of workers and the poor in Venezuela. The Bolivarian Revolution has inspired workers and the oppressed around the world and has ignited the struggle for socialism. Despite all the imperialist action and continuing threats against Venezuela, there have been great strides made. The Center for Economic and Policy Research recently released statistics showing a substantial drop in the poverty rate, based on cash income, in Venezuela. According to the CEPR, 55 percent of Venezuelans lived in poverty in 1998, when Chavez was first elected. Today 11 percent less--44 percent--live in poverty. When the gains made in health care, nutrition and education are factored in, the number drops to 35 percent. The United States, in contrast, has shown an increase in poverty rates and an increase in the number of people without medical coverage over the same years. The difference is that the wealth of Venezuela is being used for the people and not to make the ruling class increasingly rich. The oligarchy that Venezuela once was is a thing of the past. Workers and the oppressed are becoming the rulers. This fact scares Washington because of its global ramifications. The bourgeoisie in Venezuela is becoming less and less effective, and a military invasion by mercenaries from Colombia or anywhere else looks less and less like a viable option. Even a U.S. invasion would be risky, as 1.5 million Venezuelan men and women are being armed and trained to defend the country from an invasion. Still, the fact that a popular video game is expressing outright the U.S. government's plans for Venezuela is no mere coincidence. It is another threat. These types of games are dangerous on more than one level. Not only do they threaten the Bolivarian Revolution, but they act as youth recruiting tools. The military of late has been designing and marketing video games to attract youth to join its ranks. Though this game may not have been designed by the U.S. military, it is a propaganda piece aimed at disenfranchised youths who feel alienated and see no place to direct their ire. This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License. Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011 Email: ww [at] workers.org Subscribe wwnews-subscribe [at] workersworld.net [When the US elite is charged with crimes of mass destruction, many like to laugh it off as "conspiracy" nonsense ha-ha and therefore obviously false. They add that the ruling class is a bunch of bumbling idiots unable to tie their shoes muchless foment wars and steal the world blind. They then go back to sleep and urge everyone else to take a nap. They like to think that +they+ are unable to be fooled by these "bumbling idiots", and thus that the picture of the US as a near perfect country with almost no faults and no bad motives is obviously true. This lets the elite go on with its crimes of mass brainwashing/destruction. What the elite is +really good+ at is propaganda - brainwashing the rabble to give up their shares so the elite can have more more more. The above video game is one good example; they bend the minds of the young to make them stupid enough to kill to make the rich richer. Let us hear no more about elite stupidity, or elite goodness. -ed] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - David Shove shove001 [at] tc.umn.edu rhymes with clove Progressive Calendar over 2225 subscribers as of 12.19.02 please send all messages in plain text no attachments
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.